Had some extra luck when many of the losses came right around the time I reached irrevocable thresholds and when topping the scoreboard during some defeats. I had streaks of 10+ 90% win rates. In some of those games I played extremely well, in others so-so, occasionally messed up badly (eating a random torp while mid turn in my DD), but somehow I ended up on the winning team more often than not and it did feel a bit random. Went through to rank 6 in no time at all. Your skill is important, but ultimately a lot of rank progress is luck of the draw. The part of "it's still a complete victory" reminded me of the Charlie Sheen meltdown back in 2011. Your overall win rate will not be affected by bad teams - although you might have like 5-10 bad teams in a row. Everyone should stop whining about their "bad teams" because it evens out. Now I am not saying stats don't matter and the OP is most likely overestimating his ability but I think he/she should continue with ranked 100% and focus more on what he could do to improve the likelihood of a winĪlso, I keep saying this again and again, over a decent number of games, you will face as many bad teams as you will be part of. If not, it's still a complete victory as long as you learned something. If by doing this, you get to rank 1, good. And then play until you hit your next "wall" and so on. The correct way to play ranked is to get as far as you can, then when you hit the "wall", you wait a week or so and try again (better players will have moved on to higher ranks). Not everyone is meant to get to rank 1 - it just won't happen. They should - it gives them valuable experience and it accelerates the learning process a lot.Īlso, I feel people have a fundamentally flawed way of looking at ranked. I disagree profusely with the notion that new players shouldn't play ranked.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |